Comparative Study of a 1064-nm Fractional Picosecond Laser Versus IPL in Facial Rejuvenation

NACompletedINTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment

38

Participants

Timeline

Start Date

September 26, 2021

Primary Completion Date

January 8, 2023

Study Completion Date

June 19, 2023

Conditions
Skin AgingSkin RejuvenationPhotoaging
Interventions
DEVICE

1064-nm Fractional Picosecond Laser (PicoWay)

Intervention Name: 1064-nm Fractional Picosecond Laser (PicoWay) Participants in this group received full-face treatments using a PicoWay® laser system (Candela, Wayland, MA, USA) equipped with a 1064-nm RESOLVE fractional handpiece. Treatment parameters included a 6 mm spot size, 6 Hz repetition rate, 450 ps pulse duration, and energy settings ranging from 1.5 to 2.3 mJ per microbeam. Each session consisted of 2-3 passes (approximately 2000-4000 pulses), adjusted based on individual response. Three sessions were delivered at 4-6-week intervals. Cold compresses were applied for 20 minutes immediately post-treatment.

DEVICE

Intense Pulsed Light Therapy (M22 IPL System)

"Intervention Name: Intense Pulsed Light Therapy (M22 IPL System)~Intervention Description:~Participants in this group underwent full-face treatments using an M22® IPL system (Lumenis, Yokneam, Israel) with a 560 nm cutoff filter. Treatment parameters included a pulse duration of 3.5-4 ms, pulse delay of 25-30 ms, and fluence of 12-18 J/cm², adjusted based on individual response. Each treatment involved approximately 40-60 pulses. Three sessions were performed at 4-6-week intervals. A layer of medical ultrasound gel was applied before treatment and maintained for 15-20 minutes post-treatment."

Trial Locations (1)

200040

Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai

All Listed Sponsors
lead

Huashan Hospital

OTHER

NCT07122310 - Comparative Study of a 1064-nm Fractional Picosecond Laser Versus IPL in Facial Rejuvenation | Biotech Hunter | Biotech Hunter