Comparison of Maternal Hemodynamics During Spinal Anesthesia with Different Cesarean Delivery Positioning

NANot yet recruitingINTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment

216

Participants

Timeline

Start Date

April 25, 2025

Primary Completion Date

August 1, 2025

Study Completion Date

September 1, 2025

Conditions
This Study Aims to Provide Evidence on Which Positioning Strategy Offers the Best Hemodynamic OutcomesMaternal HemodynamicMaternal Positioning During CS
Interventions
BEHAVIORAL

Positioninng during Cs

"1. Group A (N=72): Immediate Supine Position (Control):~ Immediately after administering spinal anesthesia, participants will be placed in a supine position. To reduce the risk of aortocaval compression, a slight left lateral tilt (approximately 15 degrees) will be applied. This is the traditional positioning method and serves as the control group for comparison.~2. Group В (N=72): Sitting Position:~ After spinal anesthesia, participants will be positioned in a sitting position with the ack supported at a 90-degree angle for the first 2 minutes. Knees will be bent, and feet will be supported.~3. Group С (N=72): Semi-Sitting Position:~After spinal anesthesia, participants will be positioned in a semi-sitting position with the back supported at the back supported at for the first 2 minutes.~Similar to the sitting position, knees and feet will be flat."

Trial Locations (1)

Unknown

Aswan University Hospital, Aswān

All Listed Sponsors
collaborator

Aswan University Hospital

OTHER

lead

Aswan University

OTHER

NCT06857162 - Comparison of Maternal Hemodynamics During Spinal Anesthesia with Different Cesarean Delivery Positioning | Biotech Hunter | Biotech Hunter