The MAR Method Versus the Visual Estimation Method in Predicting External Blood Loss

NACompletedINTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment

237

Participants

Timeline

Start Date

May 7, 2017

Primary Completion Date

May 7, 2017

Study Completion Date

May 10, 2017

Conditions
Blood Loss
Interventions
OTHER

The MAR method

"The study was conducted in three isolated stations. Two faculty researchers designed the scenarios, while three others supervised training. Medical student investigators recorded blood loss estimates and estimation times.~Before the study, investigators received 20-minute training. Participants and investigators were blinded to actual blood volumes. Group 1 and Group 2 attended a 10-minute briefing, including consent and study introduction.~The study had two phases. In Phase 1, Group 1 used the Visual Estimation (VE) method, while Group 2 received a 2-minute MAR method training before making estimations. In Phase 2, Group 1 was trained in the MAR method and repeated estimations.A data form recorded demographics, blood loss estimates, and estimation times.~Group 1's VE data and Group 2's MAR data were compared between groups, while Group 1's VE and MAR data were analyzed within the group. Combined MAR data from both groups were used to assess the impact of gender, height, and weight."

Trial Locations (2)

06790

Baskent University, Ankara

06800

Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Ankara

All Listed Sponsors
collaborator

Baskent University

OTHER

lead

Betül Akbuğa Özel

OTHER

NCT06855472 - The MAR Method Versus the Visual Estimation Method in Predicting External Blood Loss | Biotech Hunter | Biotech Hunter