Comparative Evaluation of Implant Stability, Soft & Hard Tissue Healing Around UV Activated vs Conventional Implants

NARecruitingINTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment

12

Participants

Timeline

Start Date

February 15, 2024

Primary Completion Date

March 25, 2026

Study Completion Date

March 25, 2026

Conditions
UV Dental Implant
Interventions
PROCEDURE

conventional implant

"A full thickness mucoperiosteal flap was elevated under local anesthesia, osteotomy sites were prepared according to manufacturer's instructions and parallel pin was used to confirm position and angulation of osteotomy site. Conventional implant placement was done on one side.~Resonance frequency analysis instrument was used to measure Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) and check the primary stability of the implant. The surgical wound closure was done with mattress and single interrupted sutures, using 4-0 vicryl sutures."

PROCEDURE

UV implant

"A full thickness mucoperiosteal flap was elevated under local anesthesia and osteotomy sites were prepared according to manufacturer's instructions. Parallel pin was used to confirm position and angulation of osteotomy site. UV implant was activated using UV Activator2 and placed in another site.~Resonance frequency analysis instrument was used to measure Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) and primary stability of the implant was measured. The surgical wound closure was done with mattress and single interrupted sutures, using 4-0 vicryl sutures."

Trial Locations (1)

562157

RECRUITING

Dr. Prabhuji MLV, Bengaluru

All Listed Sponsors
lead

Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences & Hospital

OTHER