The Effectiveness of 3 Orthodontic Fixed Retention Schemes on Post-treatment Stability and Gingival Recession

NAActive, not recruitingINTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment

90

Participants

Timeline

Start Date

January 16, 2022

Primary Completion Date

June 30, 2025

Study Completion Date

November 30, 2025

Conditions
RelapseOrthodontic Retention
Interventions
DEVICE

Experimental: Single strand β-Ti fixed retainer

All 90 patients between 13-30 y.o. treated with fixed orthodontic appliances (Roth 0.018'' slot at their final finishing stage) on at least between their lower first premolars and with no lower anterior teeth crowding (total irregularity index score = 0) and no need of removable retention appliances on their lower teeth, were randomly assigned to one of the three experimental groups.

DEVICE

Experimental: SS fixed retainer

All 90 patients between 13-30 y.o. treated with fixed orthodontic appliances (Roth 0.018'' slot at their final finishing stage) on at least between their lower first premolars and with no lower anterior teeth crowding (total irregularity index score = 0) and no need of removable retention appliances on their lower teeth, were randomly assigned to one of the three experimental groups.

DEVICE

Experimental: Twisted fixed retainer

All 90 patients between 13-30 y.o. treated with fixed orthodontic appliances (Roth 0.018'' slot at their final finishing stage) on at least between their lower first premolars and with no lower anterior teeth crowding (total irregularity index score = 0) and no need of removable retention appliances on their lower teeth, were randomly assigned to one of the three experimental groups.

Trial Locations (1)

11527

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Dentistry, Departments of Orthodontics, Athens

All Listed Sponsors
lead

University of Athens

OTHER