10
Participants
Start Date
January 1, 2020
Primary Completion Date
March 15, 2020
Study Completion Date
March 15, 2020
No cueing versus Haptic cueing versus Auditory cueing during parkinson's disease gait
Patients walked in three conditions in a randomized order. During control condition, patients walked without cueing on a rectangular track of 63.2 meters at their comfortable gait speed. During Auditory Cueing Condition (ACC) patients walked on the same track using auditory cueing by the mean of a smartphone app called Soundbrenner thath deliverered rhythmic auditory stimulations through earphones paced 10% faster than each patient's preferred step frequence. During Haptic Cueing Condition (HCC) patients walked on the same track using haptic cueing by the mean of a vibratory device called Soundbrenner Pulse and attached to each patient's wrist located on their most affected side. The Soundbrenner app on the smartphone was connected to the Soundbrenner Pulse by Bluetooth to deliver rhythmic vibratory stimulations also paced 10% faster than each patient's preferred step frequence, the same frequence as during ACC.
Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Brussels
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels
Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain
OTHER