Quantitative Assessment of the Efficacy of Two Irrigation Activation Systems

NACompletedINTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment

20

Participants

Timeline

Start Date

February 7, 2022

Primary Completion Date

September 2, 2022

Study Completion Date

December 2, 2022

Conditions
Periapical PeriodontitisPolymerase Chain ReactionEnterococcus Faecalis InfectionIrrigation Activation
Interventions
OTHER

XP-endo Finisher to use irrigation activation

XPF : The canals were flushed with 2.5 mL 2.5% NaOCl for 30 s and activated by a XPF instrument that was placed in the canal to 1 mm short of the WL and powered by the motor at 800 rpm (1 N-cm torque) for 30 s according to the manufacturer's instructions. Then the canals were rinsed with 2.5 mL of 2.5% NaOCl, followed by activation of the substance with the XPF instrument for 30 seconds, the same way as above. A new XP-endo Finisher file was used for each canal.

OTHER

EndoActivator to use irrigation activation

The root canals were irrigated with 2.5 mL of 2.5% NaOCl for 30 s, followed by sonic activation of this solution with EndoActivator red tip size #25/0.04, inserted into the root canal 1 mm short of the WL, at 10,000 cpm/min. for 30 seconds. The EA polymer tip moved vertically from apical to coronal part of the canal during activation.

Trial Locations (1)

Unknown

Istanbul Medipol University, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul

All Listed Sponsors
lead

Seyda Ersahan, DDS, PhD

OTHER