Oval Abutment Versus a Circular Abutment in Dental Implants in the Anterior Maxillae

NACompletedINTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment

40

Participants

Timeline

Start Date

February 1, 2018

Primary Completion Date

February 1, 2023

Study Completion Date

March 1, 2023

Conditions
Dental Implants
Interventions
PROCEDURE

Oval section abutment of 2.9 mm

The choice of the diameter to be used as recommended by the manufacter, was determined by the mesiodistal width between the two adjacent natural teeth, in order to maintain at least 1.5mm between the implant and the adjacent tooth. When said the distance was between 5.9 and 6.3 mm, a 2.9 mm implant was placed. Implant designs are made of a titanium and zirconium alloy (Roxolid®) with a SLActive® surface (Institut Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland).

PROCEDURE

Circular section abutment of 3.3 mm

The choice of the diameter to be used as recommended by the manufacter, was determined by the mesiodistal width between the two adjacent natural teeth, in order to maintain at least 1.5mm between the implant and the adjacent tooth. When said the distance was between 6.4 and 7.1 mm, a 3.3 mm implant was placed. Implant designs are made of a titanium and zirconium alloy (Roxolid®) with a SLActive® surface (Institut Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland).

Trial Locations (1)

48940

Department of Stomatology II. UPV/EHU, Leioa

All Listed Sponsors
lead

Ana María García de la Fuente

OTHER

NCT05642520 - Oval Abutment Versus a Circular Abutment in Dental Implants in the Anterior Maxillae | Biotech Hunter | Biotech Hunter