Blended Learning Versus Face-to-face Learning in Cardiac Physiotherapy Students

NACompletedINTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment

100

Participants

Timeline

Start Date

September 12, 2020

Primary Completion Date

March 30, 2021

Study Completion Date

March 30, 2021

Conditions
LearningStudents
Interventions
OTHER

Blended-learning group

The BL program included paced, asynchronous online learning modules and scheduled online activities with strategic face-to-face lectures. Resources: 1) Moodle platform: it was used as a virtual communication platform. 2) Online syllabus: an online specific syllabus about cardiac physiotherapy was developed. 3) Online glossary: an online glossary performed by the teacher was available for the students. 4) Online videos: several videos of international and national scientific societies were provided. 5) Websites: several links to websites of international and national scientific societies such as the European Society of Cardiology, the American Heart Association or the World Heart Federation were used. 6) Online activities: five four-question online activities were created. 7) Apps, using the app Ariadna to prevent from cardiovascular risk and look for defibrillators around; 8) Online tutorship, through an online communication platform (Blackboard Collaborate).

OTHER

Face-to-face learning group

The FLG included: 1) Face-to-face classes; 2) Hardcopy syllabus; 3) Hardcopy scien-tific societies information; 4) Face-to-face activities: four questions per each theme; 5) Hardcopy glossary; and 6) Face-to-face tutorships. In all cases, the content of the infor-mation provided was the same as the information provided to the BLG, although in a face-to-face design.

Trial Locations (1)

46010

University of Valencia, Valencia

All Listed Sponsors
lead

University of Valencia

OTHER

NCT05547009 - Blended Learning Versus Face-to-face Learning in Cardiac Physiotherapy Students | Biotech Hunter | Biotech Hunter