Efficacy of Implant Surface Characteristics in Patients With History of Periodontitis

NACompletedINTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment

40

Participants

Timeline

Start Date

March 13, 2018

Primary Completion Date

July 25, 2021

Study Completion Date

July 25, 2021

Conditions
Marginal Bone Loss
Interventions
PROCEDURE

Implant placement surgery

Under local anaesthesia, full-thickness mucoperiosteal flaps were elevated, the alveolar ridge measured, and a proper implant dimension (3.75 mm and 4.25 mm diameter; 8 mm, 10 mm and 11.5 mm length) and position selected. After site preparation, each patient was randomly allocated to the test or the control group. Patients in the test group received a modified implant design with the coronal third presenting a machined surface (hybrid surface (HS) group), while in the control group the same implant design with a titanium rough surface up to the implant shoulder was used (rough surface (RS) group). Implants were placed 1 mm sub-crestally. In the case of dehiscence or fenestrations around the implant, the patient was excluded from the study. Once inserted, healing abutments (ranging between 3 -5 mm) were placed, and flaps sutured around the abutments to allow for a transmucosal healing.

Trial Locations (1)

28040

Facultad de odontología, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid

All Listed Sponsors
collaborator

Ti Care S.L

UNKNOWN

lead

Universidad Complutense de Madrid

OTHER

NCT05010382 - Efficacy of Implant Surface Characteristics in Patients With History of Periodontitis | Biotech Hunter | Biotech Hunter