Tooth-Borne Versus Tooth-Bone-Borne Rapid Maxillary Expanders: A Stereophotogrammetric Evaluation of Soft Tissues

NACompletedINTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment

32

Participants

Timeline

Start Date

May 20, 2016

Primary Completion Date

February 14, 2017

Study Completion Date

July 17, 2017

Conditions
Posterior Crossbite
Interventions
DEVICE

Rapid Maxillary Expansion Treatment with Tooth-borne RME appliance (Hyrax)

The patients were treated with a expansion appliance containing a Hyrax expansion screw positioned parallel to the second premolars and were used to correct the posterior crossbite. RME activation was performed twice a day for the first week and then once per day. When it was decided that the expansion was sufficient (until the palatal tubercles of the upper molars came into contact with the buccal tubercles of the lower molars), the screw was fixed with the 0.012-inch ligature wire (American Orthodontics) and the appliance was kept in the mouth without being activated for 3 months.

DEVICE

Rapid Maxillary Expansion Treatment with Hybrid hyrax RME appliance

The patients were treated with a Hybrid hyrax RME appliance containing a Hyrax expansion screw positioned parallel to the second premolars and mini-screws. RME activation was performed twice a day for the first week and then once per day. When it was decided that the expansion was sufficient (until the palatal tubercles of the upper molars came into contact with the buccal tubercles of the lower molars), the screw was fixed with the 0.012-inch ligature wire (American Orthodontics) and the appliance was kept in the mouth without being activated for 3 months.

All Listed Sponsors
lead

Gökçenur Gökçe

OTHER

NCT04828213 - Tooth-Borne Versus Tooth-Bone-Borne Rapid Maxillary Expanders: A Stereophotogrammetric Evaluation of Soft Tissues | Biotech Hunter | Biotech Hunter