One-stage Versus Two-stage Inverted U-shaped Ridge Splitting

NACompletedINTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment

14

Participants

Timeline

Start Date

October 1, 2019

Primary Completion Date

September 30, 2020

Study Completion Date

September 30, 2020

Conditions
Maxillary Ridge Augmentation
Interventions
PROCEDURE

One stage ridge splitting with simultaneous implant placement

"A full mucoperiosteal flap was raised using the sharp periosteal elevator to expose the bone crestally and buccally.~An inverted U-shaped bone cut, down to the cancellous bone, was done in the undercut area with a piezoelectric device.~The horizontal bone cut was made apical to the most concave point in the undercut area with a distance of 3 mm.~The two vertical bone cuts were placed at least 1 mm away from the adjacent roots and extended beyond the undercut area.~The released bone end was minimally elevated using a periosteotome through a greenstick fracture.~All implants were installed with the implant shoulders flush to the bone level using a low-speed drilling procedure."

PROCEDURE

Two-stage ridge splitting with implant placement

"The first surgery is the same as one stage ridge splitting Four weeks later, after revascularization between the bone block and the mucoperiosteum, the second surgery will be performed.~A crestal incision was done and the envelope flap slightly elevated to preserve the blood supply.~The implants will be placed in the same manner as one stage ridge splitting"

Trial Locations (1)

Unknown

Outpatient Clinic of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria

All Listed Sponsors
lead

Hams Hamed Abdelrahman

OTHER

NCT04720495 - One-stage Versus Two-stage Inverted U-shaped Ridge Splitting | Biotech Hunter | Biotech Hunter