Biofeedback Vs Electrical Stimulation in Treatment of Fecal Incontinence

NACompletedINTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment

93

Participants

Timeline

Start Date

March 4, 2018

Primary Completion Date

December 27, 2018

Study Completion Date

February 28, 2019

Conditions
Fecal IncontinenceEncopresisFecal Soiling
Interventions
DEVICE

Biofeedback

Biofeedback therapy in addition to the conventional measures done in the control Group. It was performed in the same position used for baseline manometry. The used protocol included strength and sensory training, twice weekly for 3 months. Strength training was performed by a double-lumen rectal PVC balloon clothed catheter (MMS U-72210).

DEVICE

Electrical stimulation

A positive auto adhesive electrode was applied above the medial malleolus over the S3 dermatome. A second negative electrode was applied just below the same malleolus. Both electrodes were linked to an electrical stimulation device ( EMS physio Ltd, OX129 F, England) with a low frequency current (10 Hz), and adjustable intensity.

OTHER

Traditional treatment

Conventional treatment through Kegal exercises and dietetic regulation where they had received bulky food including vegetables, fruits bran and cereals. Fast foods, spicy drinks and caffeine should be limited in child's diet. Local hygiene and zinc oxide application to the perianal skin were advised to prevent skin excoriation.

Trial Locations (1)

13518

Banha University, Banhā

All Listed Sponsors
lead

Cairo University

OTHER

NCT04380571 - Biofeedback Vs Electrical Stimulation in Treatment of Fecal Incontinence | Biotech Hunter | Biotech Hunter