MODERATE CONTINUOUS TRAINING VERSUS HIIT IN CANCER STADIUM II.

NACompletedINTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment

1,573

Participants

Timeline

Start Date

November 30, 2015

Primary Completion Date

January 31, 2017

Study Completion Date

February 28, 2019

Conditions
CancerFatigueSarcopenia
Interventions
OTHER

Group continuous training at moderate intensity

70 minutes for intervention, where 10 minutes were warm up (breathing exercises, walking, stretching), 30 minutes of continuous aerobic training at moderate intensity (60-80% FCM), with fast walking or endless tread with the floor inclined to reach the desired intensity. Also on bicycle, rowing and elliptical; Then, 20 minutes of strength training (40-60% maximum strength) with dumbbells and theraban. Ends with 10 minutes of cooling with walking and breathing exercises.

OTHER

Group high Intensity Interval Training

70 minutes for intervention, where 10 minutes were for warm-up (Respiratory exercises, walking, stretching), 30 minutes consisted of an intensity of interval training. That is, the participants who underwent 30 minutes of aerobic exercise consisted of a protocol created for this experimental group that we named 30-30. 30 seconds at moderate intensity (60-80% FCM) and 30 seconds at high intensity (80-90%). ; Then, 20 minutes of strength training (40-60% maximum strength) with dumbbells and theraban. Ends with 10 minutes of cooling with walking and breathing exercises.

OTHER

Group control

This group did not perform supervised exercise nor were they given exercise recipes or formal intervention programs. Only continued with the usual care and gave directions to maintain a healthy lifestyle based on proper nutrition and usual activities.

All Listed Sponsors
lead

University Tolteca

OTHER

NCT03915288 - MODERATE CONTINUOUS TRAINING VERSUS HIIT IN CANCER STADIUM II. | Biotech Hunter | Biotech Hunter