NCT03878056View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Cost-effectiveness Comparison Between Vaginal Versus Robotic Mesh Surgery for Apical Prolapse: Prospective, Cohort Study

CompletedOBSERVATIONAL

Enrollment

147

Participants

Timeline

Start Date

January 1, 2018

Primary Completion Date

December 31, 2020

Study Completion Date

November 30, 2021

Conditions

Prolapse; Female

Interventions

DEVICE

Vaginal: UpholdTM Lite Vaginal Support - Boston Scientific

Apical prolapse reconstructive surgery by Transvaginal mesh vs Robotic sacral colpopexy

Trial Locations (1)

18288

Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institutet Danderyd University Hospital, Stockholm

All Listed Sponsors

lead

Karolinska Institutet

OTHER

NCT03878056 - Cost-effectiveness Comparison Between Vaginal Versus Robotic Mesh Surgery for Apical Prolapse: Prospective, Cohort Study | Biotech Hunter | Biotech Hunter