Pulsed Current Versus Russian Current Effects in Healthy Young Subjects.

NACompletedINTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment

30

Participants

Timeline

Start Date

January 8, 2019

Primary Completion Date

June 30, 2019

Study Completion Date

August 30, 2019

Conditions
Healthy YoungElectric Stimulation Therapy
Interventions
DEVICE

Pulsed current

"For stage 1 of the study, which corresponds to analysis of the evoked torque, evaluation of the discomfort level, current intensity, analysis of neuromuscular efficiency and clinical efficiency, 2 configurations (PC1 and PC2) will be used.~PC1, will be set at a frequency of 100 Hz, phase duration of 1000 microseconds, ON-OFF time of 5s:10s.~PC2, will be set at a frequency of 100 Hz, phase duration of 200 microseconds ON-OFF time of 5s:10s.~For stage 2 of the study, which corresponds to the analysis of the fatigability level, only the PC1 configuration will be used."

DEVICE

Russian Current

"For stage 1 of the study, which corresponds to analysis of the evoked torque, discomfort level, current intensity, neuromuscular efficiency and clinical efficiency, 2 configurations (RC1 and RC2) will be used.~RC1, will be set to a frequency of 100 Hz, burst duty cycle of 20%, ON-OFF time of 5s:10s.~RC2, will be set at a frequency of 100 Hz, burst duty cycle of 50%, ON-OFF time of 5s:10s.~For stage 2 of the study, which corresponds to the analysis of the fatigability level, only the RC2 configuration will be used."

Trial Locations (1)

90690-200

Exercise Research Laboratory, School of Physical Education, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre

All Listed Sponsors
lead

Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

OTHER

NCT03796117 - Pulsed Current Versus Russian Current Effects in Healthy Young Subjects. | Biotech Hunter | Biotech Hunter