Orogastric Versus Nasogastric Intubation

NACompletedINTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment

13

Participants

Timeline

Start Date

August 10, 2016

Primary Completion Date

May 10, 2017

Study Completion Date

December 10, 2017

Conditions
Feeding Patterns
Interventions
DEVICE

Orogastric intubation

Patient was placed in Fowler position (45º) and intraoral infiltrative anesthesia was carried out with Lidocaine 2% (without vasoconstrictor) at gingival papilla in the vestibular-palatine direction. A polyurethane enteral tube (Medicone®, Cachoeirinha - Brazil) was inserted through the mouth and passed into de stomach, followed by fixation of the tube tip to a superior molar or premolar, in its palatine surface. For dental amarry it waas used a suture wire in stainless steel size 1.0

DEVICE

Nasogastric intubation

After nostril anesthesia with xylocaine gel, a polyurethane enteral tube was inserted through the nose and its tip was positioned in the gastric lumen, according to the nose-ear-xiphoid method. The tube was attached to the face using antiallergic adhesive tape.

Trial Locations (1)

99020060

Renato dos Santos, Passo Fundo

All Listed Sponsors
lead

Universidade de Passo Fundo

OTHER

NCT03670238 - Orogastric Versus Nasogastric Intubation | Biotech Hunter | Biotech Hunter