Robotic-assisted Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Approach for Rectal Cancer Surgery

NACompletedINTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment

57

Participants

Timeline

Start Date

April 29, 2015

Primary Completion Date

January 12, 2017

Study Completion Date

January 12, 2017

Conditions
Rectal Cancer
Interventions
PROCEDURE

Total Operative time

Investigators compare the preparation time of the procedure in the operating room and the actual operative time

PROCEDURE

Margin assessment

In this intervention investigators measure the proximal, distal and the important circumferential radial margin away from the tumor to determine if this arm is oncologically safe or not.

PROCEDURE

Conversion rate to open surgery

In this interversion investigators try to measure how much is this arm feasible to completely perform the procedure whether robotically or laparoscopically without conversion to open surgery

PROCEDURE

Baseline demographics

These include gender, age, ASA and BMI. All these data are analyzed and compared in both groups

PROCEDURE

Preoperative data

"These include distance of the tumor from the anal verge, clinical stage, whether preoperative chemoradiation CRT, presence of residual tumor after CRT. All were analyzed and compared"

PROCEDURE

Postoperative data

These include pathological stage, number of harvested lymph nodes and immediate postoperative outcome within one month (days of return of bowel function, days of hospital stay, complications, if any, like anastomotic leakage, ileus,wound problems and others, rate of reoperation, rate of readmission \& 30-days mortality. All were analyzed and compared

All Listed Sponsors
lead

National Cancer Institute, Egypt

OTHER

NCT03589131 - Robotic-assisted Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Approach for Rectal Cancer Surgery | Biotech Hunter | Biotech Hunter