Comparison of Conventional Lightwand Intubation Versus Video-laryngoscope Guided Lightwand Intubation in Simulated Cervical Spine-immobilized Patients

NACompletedINTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment

318

Participants

Timeline

Start Date

December 19, 2016

Primary Completion Date

October 13, 2017

Study Completion Date

October 13, 2017

Conditions
General Anesthesia
Interventions
DEVICE

Video-laryngoscope guided lightwand

After anesthetic induction,the difficult airway is simulated by wearing a semi-hard neck collar. For intubation, video-laryngoscope is inserted into the oral cavity ntil the epiglottis tip was visible without lifting the epiglottic vallecula. Then, the endotracheal tube with lightwand is inserted toward the midline under the epiglottis and the intubation is performed looking the transilluminated light of lightwand.

DEVICE

lightwand alone

After anesthetic induction,the difficult airway is simulated by wearing a semi-hard neck collar. Then, the endotracheal tube with lightwand is inserted and the intubation is performed with conventional method (blind technique by confirming transillumination).

Trial Locations (1)

03722

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul

All Listed Sponsors
lead

Yonsei University

OTHER

NCT03169556 - Comparison of Conventional Lightwand Intubation Versus Video-laryngoscope Guided Lightwand Intubation in Simulated Cervical Spine-immobilized Patients | Biotech Hunter | Biotech Hunter