Concept Mapping as a Scalable Method for Identifying Patient-Important Outcomes

CompletedOBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment

148

Participants

Timeline

Start Date

January 31, 2016

Primary Completion Date

January 29, 2018

Study Completion Date

March 2, 2018

Conditions
Concept Mapping Versus Interviews
Interventions
OTHER

Interviews

Patients will be engaged in open-ended, semi-structured qualitative interviews, which will be performed one-on-one either in person or over the phone (depending on the healthcare setting that they are recruited from). Qualitative interviews will be audio recorded, with the patient's permission, transcribed, de-identified and entered into NVivo software for coding and analysis.

OTHER

Concept Mapping (CM)

"The CM process consists of 3 steps that take place over 3 sessions:~Step 1: Generation of Ideas- Participants brainstorm and generate responses to the focus statement. Once the group agrees that no new statements are being generated, the list of statements is reviewed within the group.~Step 2: Structuring of Statements- Each participant is given a set of sort cards and asked to sort the statements into piles. Participants then rate each idea regarding importance. Research staff enters this information into the CM software.~Concept Systems Global Software generates point maps using a technique that detects underlying similarities/differences between statements. The CM software then uses hierarchical cluster analysis to draw boundaries around the point map to create conceptual clusters.~Step 3: Interpretation- The CM group revises the concept map. Participants review the cluster names suggested by the software and decide upon final naming of each cluster as a group."

Trial Locations (1)

19107

ThomasJeffersonU, Philadelphia

All Listed Sponsors
collaborator

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

OTHER

lead

Thomas Jefferson University

OTHER

NCT02792777 - Concept Mapping as a Scalable Method for Identifying Patient-Important Outcomes | Biotech Hunter | Biotech Hunter