LLM-Assisted vs Manual Writing for Clinical Documentation: Effects on Time and Quality

NACompletedINTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment

21

Participants

Timeline

Start Date

February 18, 2025

Primary Completion Date

March 14, 2025

Study Completion Date

July 16, 2025

Conditions
Clinician-in-the-loopClinical DocumentationLarge Language Model
Interventions
OTHER

Template-Based LLM Assistant

This study uses CocktailAI, a template-based LLM assistant co-developed by the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, and Fitting Cloud Inc. (Kyoto, Japan). It is designed to extract relevant information from EHRs using LLMs and embed the extracted content into predefined templates. In this trial, the inputs are six simulated patient records (no real patient data). Text generation uses Gemini-2.0-flash-lite. Templates for discharge summaries and discharge referrals are pre-defined by a team member.

OTHER

Manual Writing

The same document templates are provided; however, all LLM instruction prompts are removed in advance. Clinicians manually write the documents, following the template structure, for each of the six simulated cases.

Trial Locations (1)

606-8507

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine 54 Shogoin, Kawahara, Sakyo, Kyoto

All Listed Sponsors
collaborator

Fitting Cloud Inc.

UNKNOWN

lead

Kyoto University, Graduate School of Medicine

OTHER

NCT07187050 - LLM-Assisted vs Manual Writing for Clinical Documentation: Effects on Time and Quality | Biotech Hunter | Biotech Hunter