Piezosurgery Versus Conventional Techniques in Orthognathic Surgery

NANot yet recruitingINTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment

70

Participants

Timeline

Start Date

October 1, 2025

Primary Completion Date

April 1, 2027

Study Completion Date

October 1, 2027

Conditions
Orthognathic Surgical ProceduresPiezoelectric Technique
Interventions
DEVICE

Piezosurgery

Initially introduced in the field of implantology, piezosurgery has gained increasing popularity in orthognathic surgery in recent years (7-9). This technique utilizes ultrasonic vibrations ranging from 60-210 μm/s at frequencies between 24-29 kHz to cut bone, thereby minimizing trauma to surrounding soft tissue (10). Although numerous studies have been conducted, many clinical investigations have been limited by small sample sizes and insufficiently described methodologies (17, 18). Furthermore, the lack of standardized assessment tools hinders reliable comparisons of outcomes across studies (19). While surgeons increasingly recommend the use of piezosurqical instruments in orthognathic surgery, robust evidence from the literature remains insufficient to support the change in surgical technique.

DEVICE

Conventional techniques

In the control group a Lindemann burr will be used to perform the horizontal and vertical osteotomies and the cut at the lower border of the mandible. A reciprocal saw will then be used to connect the horizontal and vertical osteotomies in the sagittal plane.

Trial Locations (2)

5664BE

Anna Ziekenhuis, Geldrop

3015 GD

Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam

Sponsors
All Listed Sponsors
lead

Erasmus Medical Center

OTHER

NCT07174193 - Piezosurgery Versus Conventional Techniques in Orthognathic Surgery | Biotech Hunter | Biotech Hunter