Comparison of Postoperative Effects of Articaine and Lidocaine in Mucogingival Surgery

NACompletedINTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment

43

Participants

Timeline

Start Date

January 1, 2025

Primary Completion Date

July 30, 2025

Study Completion Date

July 30, 2025

Conditions
Local Analgesia Via InfiltrationWound HealPain, PostoperativeHemorrhage
Interventions
DRUG

Lidocaine hydrochloride 2% with epinephrine 1:100 000

Patient were received infiltrative anesthesia with Lidocaine (Jetokain, Adeka Ilaç, Samsun, Türkiye): Active ingredient: Each 1 ml contains 20 mg lidocaine hydrochloride (HCL) and 0.012 mg epinephrine base. Excipients: Sodium metabisulfite, sodium chloride, water for injection.

DRUG

Articaine 4% with epinephrine 1:100,000

Patients were received Infiltrative anesthesia with Articaine (Ultracain DS Forte, Sanofi Aventis İlaçları, Istanbul, Türkiye): Active ingredient: 40 mg articaine HCL and 0.012 mg epinephrine per 1 ml. Excipients: Sodium chloride, sodium metabisulfite, hydrochloric acid, water for injection

PROCEDURE

Free gingival graft (FGG)

FGG surgery was performed around natural teeth and implants where keratinized gingival tissue was inadequate.

Trial Locations (1)

20100

Pamukkale University Faculty of Dentistry, Denizli

All Listed Sponsors
lead

Pamukkale University

OTHER

NCT07145879 - Comparison of Postoperative Effects of Articaine and Lidocaine in Mucogingival Surgery | Biotech Hunter | Biotech Hunter