Comparison of Dynamic Mechanical Power Formula With Geometric Method in Pressure- and Volume-Controlled Ventilation: A Validation Study

CompletedOBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment

37

Participants

Timeline

Start Date

April 1, 2025

Primary Completion Date

June 1, 2025

Study Completion Date

June 1, 2025

Conditions
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)Ventilated Patient in Intensive Care
Interventions
OTHER

Volume-Controlled Ventilation (VCV) with inspiratory-to-expiratory (I:E) ratio of 1:2.

Patients received volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) with an inspiratory-to-expiratory (I:E) ratio of 1:2. Mechanical power was calculated geometrically (MPgeo) using ventilator screenshots, and results were compared with dynamic mechanical power (MPdyn) values.

OTHER

Volume-Controlled Ventilation (VCV) with inspiratory-to-expiratory (I:E) ratio of 1:1.

Patients received volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) with an inspiratory-to-expiratory (I:E) ratio of 1:1. MPgeo was computed from ventilator screenshots and compared to MPdyn values to assess agreement.

OTHER

Pressure-Controlled Ventilation (PCV) with inspiratory-to-expiratory (I:E) ratio of 1:2.

Patients received pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) with an I:E ratio of 1:2. Mechanical power was measured using both geometric (MPgeo) and dynamic (MPdyn) methods for validation purposes.

OTHER

Pressure-Controlled Ventilation (PCV) with inspiratory-to-expiratory (I:E) ratio of 1:1.

Patients received pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) with an I:E ratio of 1:1. Geometric mechanical power calculations from ventilator screenshots were compared with MPdyn values for accuracy assessment.

Trial Locations (1)

Unknown

Bakirkoy Sadi Konuk Research Hospital, Istanbul

All Listed Sponsors
lead

Başakşehir Çam & Sakura City Hospital

OTHER_GOV