Anatomical and Functional Outcomes of Perigee and Apogee Mesh in Total Pelvic Floor Reconstruction Versus Gynecare Prolift

NACompletedINTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment

258

Participants

Timeline

Start Date

January 1, 2010

Primary Completion Date

January 30, 2014

Study Completion Date

January 30, 2014

Conditions
Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Interventions
DEVICE

Perigee and Apogee Mesh

The investigators divided the patients randomly into three groups :the group A received Perigee and Apogee polypropylene mesh(PA);the group B received Gynecare prolift polypropylene mesh;the group C was without any mesh.

DEVICE

Gynecare Prolift Mesh

The investigators divided the patients randomly into three groups :the group A received Perigee and Apogee polypropylene mesh(PA);the group B received Gynecare prolift polypropylene mesh;the group C was without any mesh.

PROCEDURE

Traditional Surgery

The investigators divided the patients randomly into three groups :the group A received Perigee and Apogee polypropylene mesh(PA);the group B received Gynecare prolift polypropylene mesh;the group C was without any mesh.

Sponsors
All Listed Sponsors
lead

Nanjing Medical University

OTHER

NCT03070873 - Anatomical and Functional Outcomes of Perigee and Apogee Mesh in Total Pelvic Floor Reconstruction Versus Gynecare Prolift | Biotech Hunter | Biotech Hunter