Comparison of Two Different Insole Types in Painful Flexible Flatfoot

NACompletedINTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment

67

Participants

Timeline

Start Date

January 31, 2014

Primary Completion Date

January 31, 2016

Study Completion Date

February 29, 2016

Conditions
Flatfoot
Interventions
DEVICE

CAD/CAM Insole

A computer numerical control machine was used to product insoles according to pedobarographic pressure data;35 Shore A hardness ethyl vinyl acetate was used for the main insole, and 3 mm, 15 Shore A hardness ethyl vinyl acetate was used for covering. Orthotic insoles have been implemented in a pair of sports shoes.

DEVICE

Semi-custom Insole

Plantar surfaces of each patient's metatarsophalangeal joints were marked with a thick broad marker, and the participants were asked to stand on a clean paper. The borders of the foot were then drawn, and the medial longitudinal arch length was marked from the anterior aspect of the heel to the first metatarsophalangeal joint. These marks were used in designing and production. 35 Shore A hardness ethyl vinyl acetate was used for the main insole, and 3 mm, 15 Shore A hardness ethyl vinyl acetate was used for covering. Orthotic insoles have been implemented in a pair of sports shoes.

OTHER

Control

15 Shore A hardness ethyl vinyl acetate, implemented in a pair of sports shoes as a placebo insole.

All Listed Sponsors
collaborator

Hacettepe University

OTHER

lead

Eastern Mediterranean University

OTHER

NCT02706327 - Comparison of Two Different Insole Types in Painful Flexible Flatfoot | Biotech Hunter | Biotech Hunter