Efficacy Study of Different Laboratory Management Strategies and Drug Regimens in HIV-infected Children in Africa

PHASE4CompletedINTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment

1,206

Participants

Timeline

Start Date

March 31, 2007

Primary Completion Date

March 31, 2012

Study Completion Date

June 30, 2012

Conditions
Human Immunodeficiency Virus
Interventions
OTHER

Clinically Driven Monitoring (CDM)

Participants were examined by a doctor and had routine full blood count with white cell differential, lymphocyte subsets (CD4, CD8), biochemistry tests (bilirubin, urea, creatinine, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase) at screening, randomisation (lymphocytes only), weeks 4, 8, and 12, then every 12 weeks. Screening results were used to assess eligibility. All subsequent results at and after randomisation were only returned if requested for clinical management (authorised by centre project leaders); haemoglobin results at week 8 were automatically returned on the basis of early anaemia in a previous adult trial as were grade 4 laboratory toxicities (protocol safety criteria). Total lymphocytes and CD4 tests were never returned for CDM participants, but for all children other investigations (including tests from the routine panels) could be requested and concomitant drugs prescribed, as clinically indicated at extra patient-initiated or scheduled visits.

OTHER

Laboratory plus Clinical Monitoring (LCM)

Participants were examined by a doctor and had routine full blood count with white cell differential, lymphocyte subsets (CD4, CD8), biochemistry tests (bilirubin, urea, creatinine, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase) at screening, randomisation (lymphocytes only), weeks 4, 8, and 12, then every 12 weeks. All results were returned to physicians for patient management. Other investigations (including tests from the routine panels) could be requested and concomitant drugs prescribed, as clinically indicated at extra patient-initiated or scheduled visits.

DRUG

Arm A: ABC+3TC+NNRTI

Children received a standard WHO-recommended regimen of open-label lamivudine, abacavir, plus NNRTI continuously. The NNRTI (nevirapine or efavirenz) was chosen by clinicians according to local availability and age.

DRUG

Arm B: ZDV+ABC+3TC+NNRTI->ABC+3TC+NNRTI maintenance

Children initiated ART using an induction-maintenance approach, starting with open-label four-drug lamivudine, abacavir, NNRTI, plus zidovudine for 36 weeks, then open-label lamivudine, abacavir, plus NNRTI subsequently. The NNRTI (nevirapine or efavirenz) was chosen by clinicians according to local availability and age.

DRUG

Arm C: ZDV+ABC+3TC+NNRTI->ZDV+ABC+3TC maintenance

Children initiated ART using an induction-maintenance approach, starting with open-label four-drug lamivudine, abacavir, NNRTI, plus zidovudine for 36 weeks, then open-label lamivudine, abacavir, plus zidovudine subsequently (triple NRTI maintenance). The NNRTI (nevirapine or efavirenz) was chosen by clinicians according to local availability and age.

DRUG

Once-daily ABC+3TC

DRUG

Twice-daily ABC+3TC

DRUG

Continued cotrimoxazole prophylaxis

OTHER

Stopped cotrimoxazole prophylaxis

Trial Locations (4)

Unknown

MRC /UVRI Uganda Research Unit on AIDS, Entebbe

Joint Clinical Research Centre, Kampala

Baylor College of Medicine Children's Foundation, Mulago

University of Zimbabwe Medical School, Harare

Sponsors
All Listed Sponsors
collaborator

Department for International Development, United Kingdom

OTHER_GOV

collaborator

ViiV Healthcare

INDUSTRY

collaborator

GlaxoSmithKline

INDUSTRY

lead

Medical Research Council

OTHER_GOV

NCT02028676 - Efficacy Study of Different Laboratory Management Strategies and Drug Regimens in HIV-infected Children in Africa | Biotech Hunter | Biotech Hunter