Ultrasound Plus Nerve Stimulator Versus Nerve Stimulator Guided Lumbar Plexus Block

NACompletedINTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment

48

Participants

Timeline

Start Date

January 31, 2014

Primary Completion Date

August 31, 2014

Study Completion Date

October 31, 2014

Conditions
Knee Arthroscopy Surgery
Interventions
PROCEDURE

Ultrasound and nerve stimulator guided lumbar plexus block

An insulated nerve block needle connected to a nerve stimulator that was delivering a current of 1.5 mA at a frequency of 2 Hz was then inserted in the long axis (in- plane) of the ultrasound transducer towards the the hypoechoic psoas compartment. If the quadriceps contraction which produces patella twitching was elicited with an initial current of 1.5mA,then the current should be reduced until contraction is still present between 0.3 to 0.5 mA .Afterward, the lumbar plexus nerve block was performed by using 30mL of 0.5% ropivacaine. Contraction should stop below a current of 0.3mA, otherwise intraneural needle position should be suspected.

PROCEDURE

Nerve stimulator guided lumbar plexus block

The block was conducted following traditional Winnie approach. The accepted end point for the lumbar plexus is stimulation of the femoral nerve component, observed by contraction of the quadriceps muscle. Quadriceps contraction which produces patella twitching should be sought with an initial current of 1.5mA, and once elicited the current should be reduced until contraction is still present between 0.3 to 0.5 mA. Afterward, the lumbar plexus nerve block was performed by using 30mL of 0.5% ropivacaine. Contraction should stop below a current of 0.3mA, otherwise intraneural needle position should be suspected.

Trial Locations (1)

430030

Tongji Hospital, Wuhan

All Listed Sponsors
lead

Huazhong University of Science and Technology

OTHER

NCT02020096 - Ultrasound Plus Nerve Stimulator Versus Nerve Stimulator Guided Lumbar Plexus Block | Biotech Hunter | Biotech Hunter