A Comparison Between Wireless CROS and Bone-anchored Hearing Devices for Single-Sided Deafness: A Pilot Study

NACompletedINTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment

9

Participants

Timeline

Start Date

January 31, 2013

Primary Completion Date

October 31, 2013

Study Completion Date

October 31, 2013

Conditions
Unilateral Hearing LossUnilateral Deafness
Interventions
DEVICE

CROS hearing aid

Participants were randomly assigned to be fitted with the CROS hearing aid either at the end of the first visit or at the end of the second visit. They were given a 2-week trial with the CROS and asked to refrain from wearing their BAHD during that time. At the end of the first visit, four participants were fitted with the CROS hearing aid and were subsequently tested with this device on their second visit, at which time they were instructed to use the BAHD for the next 2 weeks. This protocol was reversed in the other four participants, with testing after each device experience. Both devices were compared on head shadow effect reduction, speech perception measures in quiet and in noise, self-assessment questionnaires, and daily diaries.

DEVICE

Bone-anchored hearing device (BAHD)

All participants had received BAHD implantation prior to the study. They were randomly selected to continue wearing their BAHD for 2 weeks following the end of the first visit or the end of the second visit. Both devices were compared on head shadow effect reduction, speech perception measures in quiet and in noise, self-assessment questionnaires, and daily diaries.

All Listed Sponsors
collaborator

Dalhousie University

OTHER

lead

Manohar Bance

OTHER

NCT01715948 - A Comparison Between Wireless CROS and Bone-anchored Hearing Devices for Single-Sided Deafness: A Pilot Study | Biotech Hunter | Biotech Hunter